Professional Development Grants
WINTER 2017 DEADLINES
Sent to Deans by Nov 20; Uploaded to Box by Nov 22
The Provost Faculty Development Grant supports faculty development activities that will promote the professional growth of the faculty.
The intent of this program is to support a singular project. The project could be related to the teaching, scholarship or service activities of a faculty member. While the term project is open to many interpretations, it is important that all expenditures support the project requested.
The narrative must justify each of the requests made within the proposal as defined by the scope of the project.
All expenses must comply with state and university travel and purchasing policies.
Questions, if any, can be directed the Director of e-Learning: 657-2214, firstname.lastname@example.org.
- These funds are to be used for Faculty Development in scholarship, teaching and service.
Faculty who request these funds are asked to reflect on how it will impact professional
growth. Faculty who receive these awards are required to submit a final report detailing
the outcomes of their activity.
- These funds may support, conference expenses, workshop attendance, residencies, professional
travel that might not be funded by other means, or other uses that help achieve the
mission and/or goals of your unit related to the University. However, memberships,
computer hardware, tools, and other “equipment-type” items are not appropriate for
this solicitation. Please note that another exception is that this pool cannot be
used for personal compensation.
A. Anticipated Funding Amount:
$300.00 to $2000.00 per proposal. Proposals that exceed the maximum available must include a statement of how the additional funds will be paid (personal funds, other university funding sources, grant funding, etc).
B. Three calls for funding will be issued each year: Fall, Spring, and Summer.
A. Eligibility: Faculty members who carry a continuing appointment are eligible for these awards. This includes tenured and tenure track, university lecturers, adjunct professors and LOAs who are on primarily teaching appointments.
B. Limit on Number of Funded Proposals: Faculty may only be funded once per academic year. If a grant application is not funded, the faculty member may reapply in the same fiscal year.
Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
A. Body of the proposal. Should not exceed 4 double-spaced pages in 12 point font.
1. Description and objectives. Describe the project or activity and its objectives fully, and explain how and when the objectives will be attained.
2. Impact. Who will benefit from this project or activity and in what ways?
3. Assessment of impact. Describe how you will assess the impact of the project and the extent to which it achieves the objectives.
4. Budget narrative. Provide a narrative that explains each budget item, and how and when the funds are to be used. Do not simply list the budget, itemize as clearly as possible. The committee will likely disallow expenses requested that are not justified in relation to the project or that exceed normal travel expenses. If a rental car is requested, it must be justified.
B. Submission Process. Faculty must obtain approval from their department chair or program director and then submit the proposal to the dean of their college. Proposals will be submitted to the Professional Development Box account by the dean’s office. It is advised that faculty members consult with their chairs prior to submission to ensure that the chair understands the proposal.
Proposal Processing and Review Procedures
A. Proposals will be reviewed by the Faculty Development committee, who will use the following criteria to evaluate the quality of all proposals.
1. Overall impact
a. Extent and quality of professional development of the faculty member. In what ways and to what extent will the activities contribute to the professional development of the faculty member?
b. Extent and quality of improvement in student learning and teaching. In what ways and to what extent will the activities contribute to improvement in student learning, teaching, and curriculum?
2. Quality of the written proposal
a. Is the proposal comprehensible to a non-specialist audience? Proposals should be addressed to a non-specialist audience. Please clarify terminology and acronyms and minimize jargon.
b. Is the proposal complete and in the proper format? NOTE: The committee may decide NOT to review proposals that omit one or more sections of the required format or that do not comply with page limits.
B. Review and Selection Process:
1. Proposals will be reviewed by the Faculty Development committee, composed of a faculty representative from each college. The Director of e-Learning and the Director of Grants & Sponsored Programs serve as ex officio members of this committee.
Award Administration Information
A. Notification of Award: Faculty will be contacted by the Director of Grants & Sponsored Programs informing them whether their proposal was funded.
B. Award Conditions:
1. The committee will NOT award a grant to a faculty member denied reappointment who plans not to return to the University or to an individual who failed to submit an acceptable final report for a previously funded grant.
C. Reporting Requirements
1. Grant recipients will be expected to submit a report to the GSP office within 60 days of their activity. In the final report, the faculty is asked to comment on how their activity met the goals of the proposal. The format for this report will be included with the award letter.